Pitch as a Recipient, Channel, and Context Factor Affecting Thought Reliance and Persuasion.

Three experiments tested how low versus high pitch generated from sources beyond a message communicator can affect reliance on thoughts and influence recipients' attitudes. First, participants wrote positive or negative thoughts about an exam proposal (Experiments 1, 2) or their academic abilities (Experiment 3). Then, pitch from the message recipient (Experiment 1), channel (Experiment 2), or context (Experiment 3) was manipulated to be high or low. Experiment 1 showed that when participants vocally expressed their thoughts using low (vs. high) pitch, thoughts had a greater effect on attitudes toward exams. Experiment 2 revealed low (vs. high) pitch sounds from the keyboard participants used to write their thoughts produced the same effect on thought usage. Experiment 3 demonstrated that thoughts influenced attitudes more when listed while background music was low (vs. high) Pitch can influence attitudes through a meta-cognitive thought reliance process whether emerging from the recipient, channel, or context.

Strengthening the Link between Vaccine Predispositions and Vaccine Advocacy through Certainty.

BACKGROUND: Instruments designed to assess individual differences in predispositions towards vaccination are useful in predicting vaccination-related outcomes. Despite their importance, there is relatively little evidence regarding the conditions under which these instruments are more predictive. The current research was designed to improve the ability of these kinds of instruments to predict vaccination advocacy by considering the certainty associated with the responses to vaccination scales. METHOD: Across two studies, participants completed the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire BMQ scale (Study 1) or the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale (Study 2). The certainty participants had in their responses to each scale was either measured (Study 1) or manipulated (Study 2). Intentions to advocate in favor of vaccination served as the criterion measure in both studies. RESULTS: As expected, the scales significantly predicted vaccination advocacy, contributing to enhancing the predictive validity of the instruments used in the studies. Most relevant, certainty moderated the extent to which these scales predicted vaccination advocacy, with greater consistency between the initial scores and the subsequent advocacy willingness obtained for those with higher certainty. CONCLUSIONS: Certainty can be useful to predict when the relationship between vaccination-related cognitions (i.e., beliefs or attitudes) and advocacy willingness is likely to be stronger.

Polarization of Attitudes as a Function of Mortality Salience: A Meta-Cognitive Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The present study analyzes how attitudes can polarize after reminders of death in the context of persuasion, and proposes that a meta-cognitive process (i.e., self-validation) can serve as a compensatory coping mechanism to deal with mortality salience. METHOD: Participants were first asked to read either a strong or a weak resume of a job applicant. Next, they listed their initial thoughts about that applicant. Then, they were asked to think about of their own death (i.e., mortality salience condition) versus being asked to think about of being cold (i.e., control condition). Finally, participants reported the confidence in their thoughts, as well as their attitudes towards the applicant. RESULTS: Participants who were assigned to the mortality salience (vs. control) condition showed greater impact of their previously generated thoughts on their subsequent attitudes. Additionally, as hypothesized, this effect of attitude polarization was mediated by changes in thought confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes unrelated to mortality can be polarized by reminders of death and this effect can operate through a meta-cognitive process of thought validation. Implications for persuasion, self-validation, and beyond are discussed.

Brief Version of the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scales for Children and Adolescents: Evidence of Validity.

BACKGROUND: Well-being has become a core concept in the study of positive child health, however, previous instruments for well-being evaluation have been centered mainly on the hedonic component. Therefore, the objective of this study was to adapt the Psychological Well-being Scales for assessing eudaimonic well-being in children and adolescents using a single-item per dimension approach. METHOD: A total of 312 participants (52.9% girls; ages 10-18) from Spain completed the Psychological Well-Being Scales Short Form, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, and their psychological well-being was evaluated via a semi-structured interview by a developmental psychologist who was an expert in positive psychology. RESULTS: Parallel analysis and exploratory factor analysis suggested a unidimensional structure that showed an excellent fit to the data. The new measure also demonstrated scalar invariance across gender and age. Moreover, the new scale significantly correlated with both WHO-5 and the expert´s ratings of psychological well-being, indicating adequate criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: The Psychological Well-Being Scales Short Form is a useful, brief measuring instrument that reduces children cognitive fatigue during evaluation.

Willingness to sacrifice among convicted Islamist terrorists versus violent gang members and other criminals.

Is terrorism just another form of criminal activity, as many nations' justice systems assume? We offer an initial answer using face-to-face interviews and structured surveys in thirty-five Spanish prisons. Recent theories of extreme sacrifice inform this direct observational and comparative study. Islamist terrorists display levels of self-sacrifice for their primary reference group similar to that of Latino gangs, but greater willingness to sacrifice for primary values than other inmates (non-radical Muslims, Latino gangs, and delinquent bands). This disposition is motivated by stronger perceived injustice, discrimination, and a visceral commitment to such values (risk/radicalization factors). Nevertheless, state authorities, prison staff, and families are (protective/de-radicalization) factors apt to reduce willingness to sacrifice and keep foreign fighters, now being released in large numbers, from returning to terrorism.

Polarization of Attitudes as a Function of Mortality Salience: A Meta-Cognitive Analysis / Polarización de las Actitudes Como Resultado de Hacer Saliente la Mortalidad: un Análisis Meta-Cognitivo

Background: The present study analyzes how attitudes can polarize afterreminders of death in the context of persuasion, and proposes that a meta-cognitive process (i.e., self-validation) can serve as a compensatory copingmechanism to deal with mortality salience. Method: Participants were firstasked to read either a strong or a weak resume of a job applicant. Next,they listed their initial thoughts about that applicant. Then, they were askedto think about of their own death (i.e., mortality salience condition) versusbeing asked to think about of being cold (i.e., control condition). Finally,participants reported the confidence in their thoughts, as well as theirattitudes towards the applicant. Results: Participants who were assigned tothe mortality salience (vs. control) condition showed greater impact of theirpreviously generated thoughts on their subsequent attitudes. Additionally,as hypothesized, this effect of attitude polarization was mediated by changesin thought confidence. Conclusions: Attitudes unrelated to mortality canbe polarized by reminders of death and this effect can operate through ameta-cognitive process of thought validation. Implications for persuasion,self-validation, and beyond are discussed.

Antecedentes: la presenteinvestigación analiza cómo las actitudes se polarizan como resultado dehacer saliente la mortalidad en el contexto de la persuasión y propone queun proceso meta-cognitivo (i.e., la auto-validación) puede servir comoun mecanismo compensatorio de afrontamiento ante la idea de la muerte.Método: los participantes fueron asignados aleatoriamente a leer uncurrículum que incluía información muy convincente o información pococonvincente sobre un candidato a un puesto de trabajo. A continuación, escribieron los pensamientos que tuvieron sobre el candidato. Después, realizaron una tarea que implicó pensar en la idea de su propia muerte (i.e.,condición de mortalidad) o pensar en la idea de tener frío (i.e., condiciónde control). Finalmente, los participantes informaron de la confianza que tuvieron en sus pensamientos, así como de las actitudes que se formaron hacia el candidato. Resultados: los participantes de la condición demortalidad (vs. control) mostraron un mayor impacto de sus pensamientosiniciales sobre sus actitudes. Además, este efecto de polarización fuemediado por la confianza en los pensamientos. Conclusiones: las actitudesno relacionadas con la mortalidad pueden polarizarse al hacer salientela mortalidad y este efecto puede ocurrir a través de un proceso meta-cognitivo de validación del pensamiento.

Brief Version of the Ryff Psychological Well-Being Scales for Childrenand Adolescents: Evidence of Validity / Versión Reducida de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff ParaNiños y Adolescentes: Evidencias de Validez

Background: Well-being has become a core concept in the study of positivechild health, however, previous instruments for well-being evaluation havebeen centered mainly on the hedonic component. Therefore, the objectiveof this study was to adapt the Psychological Well-being Scales for assessingeudaimonic well-being in children and adolescents using a single-item perdimension approach. Method: A total of 312 participants (52.9% girls;ages 10-18) from Spain completed the Psychological Well-Being ScalesShort Form, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, and their psychological well-being was evaluated via a semi-structured interview by a developmentalpsychologist who was an expert in positive psychology. Results: Parallelanalysis and exploratory factor analysis suggested a unidimensionalstructure that showed an excellent fit to the data. The new measure alsodemonstrated scalar invariance across gender and age. Moreover, thenew scale significantly correlated with both WHO-5 and the expert’sratings of psychological well-being, indicating adequate criterion validity.Conclusions: The Psychological Well-Being Scales Short Form is a useful,brief measuring instrument that reduces children cognitive fatigue duringevaluation.

Antecedentes: el bienestarse ha convertido en un concepto central para el estudio de la salud infantil,aunque los instrumentos previos para su evaluación se han centrado en sucomponente hedónico. Por ello, nuestro objetivo fue adaptar las Escalasde Bienestar Psicológico para su uso con niños y adolescentes utilizandoun enfoque de un único ítem por dimensión. Método: un total de 312participantes (52,9% mujeres; edades 10-18) españoles completaron lanueva versión reducida de las escalas de bienestar psicológico, el índicede bienestar de la OMS-5, y su bienestar fue evaluado mediante unaentrevista semiestructurada. Resultados: el análisis paralelo y el análisisfactorial exploratorio sugirieron una estructura unidimensional quemostró un ajuste excelente a los datos. Además, la nueva medida presentóinvariancia escalar para el género y la edad. La nueva escala correlacionósignificativamente con la escala de OMS-5, así como con la evaluacióndel experto externo sobre la satisfacción con la vida global, indicando unaadecuada validez de criterio. Conclusiones: la versión reducida de lasEscalas de Bienestar Psicológico para jóvenes ha mostrado unas excelentespropiedades psicométricas, siendo un instrumento de medición breve quereduce la fatiga cognitiva de los jóvenes durante la evaluación.

Validity of the Spanish Version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination Scale.

Individuals vary in the extent to which they have unfavorable attitudes towards vaccines. The Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale is a recently developed brief 12-item questionnaire created to better understand general vaccination attitudes. The current research aimed at providing a Spanish adaptation of the VAX Scale. After conducting an initial pilot study, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the Spanish version of the scale had good internal consistency and factor structure (Study 1), discriminant validity from other individual differences measures (such as the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire and the Medical Mistrust Index) as well as good predictive validity of relevant vaccination-related outcomes (Study 2). In conclusion, in the present research, the Spanish version of the VAX scale proved to have a high internal consistency, showed convergent validity with other conceptually similar constructs, and successfully predicted vaccination intentions and vaccination decisions. Having this scale available in Spanish will allow researchers to analyze vaccination processes and vaccine hesitancy over a great number of people.

The Role of Meta-Cognitive Certainty on Pornography Consumption.

BACKGROUND: The Problematic Pornography Use Scale (PPUS) was originally designed to help predicting pornography consumption. Despite the frequency with which this scale is used in the scientific literature, there is still relatively little evidence regarding the predictive validity of this important instrument. This current research introduces a construct capable of improving the ability of the scale to predict pornography consumption (meta-cognitive certainty). METHOD: Over two studies, participants completed the PPUS and the meta-cognitive certainty in their responses to the scale was measured (Study 1) or manipulated (Study 2). Self-reported porn consumption was the criterion measure in both studies, with an additional actual overt behavior relevant to consumption of porn included in Study 2. RESULTS: As expected, the PPUS significantly predicted porn consumption, confirming the predictive validity of the scale. More importantly, meta-cognitive certainty was capable of moderating the extent to which scores on the PPUS could predict porn consumption, with greater consistency between the PPUS and reported behavior from those with high (vs. low) meta-cognitive certainty. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that considering meta-cognitive certainty may be useful for predicting when the link between the PPUS and porn consumption is stronger.

Corrigendum: The Neurosciences of Health Communication: An fNIRS Analysis of Prefrontal Cortex and Porn Consumption in Young Women for the Development of Prevention Health Programs.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02132.].

The Neurosciences of Health Communication: An fNIRS Analysis of Prefrontal Cortex and Porn Consumption in Young Women for the Development of Prevention Health Programs.

This work explores the use of fNIRS neuroimaging technique using young female college students with different levels of consumption of pornography, and the activation of the prefrontal cortex (cue reactivity) when viewing a pornographic clip (cue exposure) versus a control clip. The results indicate that the viewing of the pornographic clip (vs. control clip) causes an activation of Brodmann's area 45 of the right hemisphere (BA 45, pars triangularis) (p < 0.01). An effect also appears between the level of self-reported consumption and the activation of right BA 45: the higher the level of self-reported consumption, the greater the activation (p < 0.01). On the other hand, those participants who have never consumed pornographic material do not show activity of the right BA 45 compared to the control clip (p < 0.01) indicating a qualitative difference between non-consumers and consumers. These results are consistent with other research made in the field of addictions. It is hypothesized that the mirror neuron system may be involved, through the mechanism of empathy, which could provoke vicarious eroticism. Finally, we suggest the applications that these results may have for primary and secondary prevention programs in the field of problematic consumption of pornography.

Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why.

As ordinary citizens increasingly moderate online forums, blogs, and their own social media feeds, a new type of censoring has emerged wherein people selectively remove opposing political viewpoints from online contexts. In three studies of behavior on putative online forums, supporters of a political cause (e.g., abortion or gun rights) preferentially censored comments that opposed their cause. The tendency to selectively censor cause-incongruent online content was amplified among people whose cause-related beliefs were deeply rooted in or "fused with" their identities. Moreover, six additional identity-related measures also amplified the selective censoring effect. Finally, selective censoring emerged even when opposing comments were inoffensive and courteous. We suggest that because online censorship enacted by moderators can skew online content consumed by millions of users, it can systematically disrupt democratic dialogue and subvert social harmony.

Promoting healthy eating by enhancing the correspondence between attitudes and behavioral intentions / Promocionando la alimentación saludable a través de la mejora en la relación entre actitudes e intenciones conductuales

BACKGROUND: Healthy eating campaigns are not always successful in changing food-related attitudes. Even when interventions produce the desired outcomes in attitudes, it is often challenging to translate those psychological changes into subsequent behaviors. Previous research has shown that elaboration (amount of thinking) is a critical construct for understanding the ability of attitudes to guide behavior. Instead of looking directly at objective elaboration, this study examined attitude-behavior correspondence as a function of subjective elaboration. METHOD: Participants were first randomly assigned to generate positive or negative arguments with regard to taxing junk food. After this experimental manipulation, participants reported their subjective elaboration (as an additional predictor), and their attitudes and behavioral intentions regarding the proposal (as dependent measures). RESULTS: As hypothesized, the results showed that the greater perceived elaboration, the larger the ability of attitudes to guide behavioral intentions. That is, attitudes were more predictive of behavioral intentions in participants with higher levels of perceived elaboration compared to those with relatively lower levels of subjective thinking. CONCLUSION: Health initiatives can benefit from considering the extent to which participants perceive thinking about persuasive proposals

ANTECEDENTES: las campañas que promocionan una alimentación saludable no siempre consiguen cambiar las actitudes de las personas. Incluso cuando se cambian las actitudes, a menudo esos cambios no se traducen en los correspondientes comportamientos saludables. La investigación llevada a cabo hasta este momento demuestra que la cantidad de elaboración sobre una propuesta persuasiva constituye un constructo esencial a la hora de entender la relación entre actitudes e intenciones conductuales. En la presente investigación se estudia el papel de la elaboración subjetiva en la relación entre actitudes e intenciones conductuales dentro del contexto de la evaluación de la comida saludable. MÉTODO: los participantes del estudio fueron asignados aleatoriamente a generar pensamientos positivos o negativos sobre la posibilidad de aumentar los impuestos a la comida basura. Después de esta manipulación experimental, se midió la elaboración subjetiva (predictor) y las actitudes e intenciones conductuales con respecto a la propuesta persuasiva (medidas dependientes). RESULTADOS: se encontró que cuanto mayor fue la elaboración percibida, mayor resultó la capacidad de las actitudes para guiar las intenciones conductuales. CONCLUSIÓN: las iniciativas de salud pueden beneficiarse de forma significativa al incluir una medida sencilla de la elaboración percibida

Promoting healthy eating by enhancing the correspondence between attitudes and behavioral intentions.

BACKGROUND: Healthy eating campaigns are not always successful in changing food-related attitudes. Even when interventions produce the desired outcomes in attitudes, it is often challenging to translate those psychological changes into subsequent behaviors. Previous research has shown that elaboration (amount of thinking) is a critical construct for understanding the ability of attitudes to guide behavior. Instead of looking directly at objective elaboration, this study examined attitude-behavior correspondence as a function of subjective elaboration. METHOD: Participants were first randomly assigned to generate positive or negative arguments with regard to taxing junk food. After this experimental manipulation, participants reported their subjective elaboration (as an additional predictor), and their attitudes and behavioral intentions regarding the proposal (as dependent measures). RESULTS: As hypothesized, the results showed that the greater perceived elaboration, the larger the ability of attitudes to guide behavioral intentions. That is, attitudes were more predictive of behavioral intentions in participants with higher levels of perceived elaboration compared to those with relatively lower levels of subjective thinking. CONCLUSION: Health initiatives can benefit from considering the extent to which participants perceive thinking about persuasive proposals.

Why People Enter and Embrace Violent Groups.

We distinguish two pathways people may follow when they join violent groups: compliance and internalization. Compliance occurs when individuals are coerced to join by powerful influence agents. Internalization occurs when individuals join due to a perceived convergence between the self and the group. We searched for evidence of each of these pathways in field investigations of former members of two renowned terrorist organizations: the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) (Study 1) and Islamist radical groups (Study 2). Results indicated that ex-fighters joined LTTE for reasons associated with both compliance and internalization but that ex-fighters joined Islamist radical groups primarily for reasons associated with internalization. When compliance occurred, it often took the form of coercion within LTTE but involved charismatic persuasion agents within Islamist groups. This evidence of systematic differences in the reasons why fighters enter violent groups suggests that strategies for preventing radicalization and fostering de-radicalization should be tailored to particular groups.

La evaluación de candidatos en un proceso de selección de personal: Preferencia por la experiencia sobre el potencial en contextos desfavorables / The evaluation of candidates in a personnel selection: Preference for experience over potential in unfavorable contexts

La presente investigación tiene como objeto averiguar cómo se responde a distintos perfiles en la evaluación de candidatos de selección en función de contexto organizacional. Se realizó un experimento con una muestra de participantes capacitados en selección de personal. Los participantes recibieron primero un mensaje que describía que el futuro de una organización dada era favorable o desfavorable. Luego, se les pidió a todos los participantes que leyeran la información sobre un posible candidato para dicha organización. El candidato fue descrito en términos de su experiencia previa o en términos de su potencial como profesional. Después de recibir la información sobre la organización y el perfil, se pidió a todos los participantes que evaluaran al candidato para el puesto. Esperábamos que hubiera una mayor preferencia por la experiencia en relación con el potencial, particularmente cuando el contexto era desfavorable. Como se predijo, los resultados mostraron que, en condiciones contextuales desfavorables, las actitudes hacia el candidato fueron más favorables cuando el candidato de trabajo fue presentado en términos de experiencia (vs potencial). En condiciones contextuales favorables, las actitudes hacia el candidato no variaron en función de su perfil

The present research's main goal is to examine the evaluation of a job candidate as a function of his profile and the context of the organization. An experiment was conducted with a sample of participants trained in personnel selection. Participants first received a message describing that the future of a given organization was favorable or unfavorable. Then, all participants were asked to read the information about a potential job candidate for such organization. The candidate was described in terms of his previous experience or in terms of his potential as a professional. After receiving the information about the organization and the profile, all participants were asked to evaluate the job candidate. We expected that there would be a higher preference for experience relative to potential, particularly when the context was unfavorable. As predicted, results showed that under unfavorable contextual conditions, attitudes towards the candidate were more favorable when the job candidate was portrayed in terms of experience (vs potential). Under favorable contextual conditions, attitudes towards the candidate did not vary as a function of his profile

The Effects of Overt Head Movements on Physical Performance After Positive Versus Negative Self-Talk.

Research on self-talk has found that what athletes say to themselves influences their performance in sport settings. This experiment analyzed the relationship between positive and negative self-talk and physical performance in light of another variable: overt head movements. Participants were randomly assigned to first generate and then listen to either positive or negative self-statements. They were then randomly assigned to nod (up and down) or to shake (side to side) their heads while being exposed to the self-statements they had previously generated. Finally, physical performance was assessed using a vertical-jump task, a squat test, and a deadlift task. As expected, positive self-statements led to better performance than negative self-statements in 2 out of 3 physical tasks. Most relevant, the main effect of self-talk was significantly qualified by head movements. Consistent with the authors' hypothesis, athletes' self-statements were significantly more impactful on physical performance in the head-nodding condition than in the head-shaking condition.

Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Revised Self-Monitoring Scale.

Self-Monitoring (SM) is a concept that refers to individual differences in this orientation toward regulation of social behavior. The goal of the present research was to provide a Spanish adaptation of Snyder and Gangestad's (1986) Revised SM Scale. After conducting an initial pilot study, results showed that the Spanish version of the scale had good internal reliability and adequate factor structure. In Study 1, analyses support a unidimensional structure of the scale (χ2/df = 2.64; GFI = .97; IFI = .97; TLI = .96; RMSEA = .06). In Study 2, the scale showed discriminant validity from other individual differences measures, such as Need for Cognition (r = 0.12 p = 0.14), Social Desirability (r = 0.06, p > .45) and Extraversion (r = 0.28 p = .001). In Study 3, the scale showed adequate test-retest reliability (r = 0.71, p < .001). Finally, using a paradigm of attitude-behavior consistenty, Study 4 showed that the validated scale also had good predictive validity (B = -0.819, p = .035).

Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the revised self-monitoring scales

Self-Monitoring (SM) is a concept that refers to individual differences in this orientation toward regulation of social behavior. The goal of the present research was to provide a Spanish adaptation of Snyder and Gangestad's (1986) Revised SM Scale. After conducting an initial pilot study, results showed that the Spanish version of the scale had good internal reliability and adequate factor structure. In Study 1, analyses support a unidimensional structure of the scale (χ2/df = 2.64; GFI = .97; IFI = .97; TLI = .96; RMSEA = .06). In Study 2, the scale showed discriminant validity from other individual differences measures, such as Need for Cognition (r = 0.12 p = 0.14), Social Desirability (r = 0.06, p > .45) and Extraversion (r = 0.28 p = .001). In Study 3, the scale showed adequate test-retest reliability (r = 0.71, p < .001). Finally, using a paradigm of attitude-behavior consistenty, Study 4 showed that the validated scale also had good predictive validity (B = -0.819, p = .035) (AU)

No disponible